Rereading an earlier post, I found a comment, that should be addressed thoroughly. It has been done so repeatedly by others, but, to be able to better at addressing it, I should do it myself.
The truth is that if someone really were to be an atheist, he could never complain about being judged. Judgment, justice and injustice would have no more meaning to the atheist than to a rock or a tree. When you think about it, if there is no God, there is no purpose in anything.
I really have to ask. How does one conclude that concepts such as justice and injustice have no more meaning to somebody than things which one doesn’t tend to put value on? The problem with the thinking presented is that it ignores how we tend to react as a species.
We are, regardless of how we came to be, a social species. Among social species, a few behaviors have been observed. Among them are
The first one consists of rewards for good behavior. This can range from treats, to favorable treatment, and other responses to behavior which benefits the group.
The second one consists of punishments for bad behavior. This can vary significantly, although, it isn’t good for those that go through it.
And, regardless of if a society holds a belief in a deity, these are still acknowledged. Why would that be? Is it because these ideas are of value because a deity exists, or are they of value because we are part of a society which has the goal of prospering?